Blogs Trend to the Long-Tail: Soon There Will Be No Middle
Kent Newsome wrote yesterday about the hardships of blogging. I've seen many blog posts about this in the past, after all what do bloggers know better than their own medium? But where Rubel's post struck a chord was in this section:
"Some of your readers will become your friends. This part of blogging is really a cross-blog social networking thing that is, as I have said before, the natural evolution of the internet message board. We trade ideas, comment on each other's post and generally carry on a conversation.What he is talking about here is the formation of the small-group networks I wrote about in my previous post. With common interests and cross-linking a neighborhood will form and most of the readers of any given blog within this subnetwork will likely be in the same neighborhood.That's a wonderful thing and it's one of the main reasons I keep doing this.
But the other 98% of your readers don't know you from Adam's housecat. To them you are just a name in an RSS reader with a post or two to be scanned. They won't keep reading because they like you. To the contrary, they may stop by once or twice, but if they don't affirmatively like what they see, they'll move on."
More than that however is his point that he considers some people in his blog-neighborhood as "friends." I'm assuming here that he means friends in a non-blog sort of way; if blogging were to stop, these relationships would continue. If this is the case, what is happening is that bloggers' social networks are beginning to mirror their blog-network. Network structures are flowing from type 2 to type1. Previously, I had associated the three network structures I outlined with the three main sections of the power-law continuum of the "long tail." (The long-tailers as type 1, the magic-middle/big-butt as type 2, and the A-listers as type 3.) That the middle-residents are becoming more like the long-tailers implies an aging social network. Perhaps the type 2 structure, and hence the structure of the middle of the power-law curve in blogging, is an unstable state. Blogs in the middle will either tend upward in the curve, becoming more like broadcast entities, or, after remaining in the middle for a while, come to resemble the network structure of the long-tail, where one's social network is increasingly reflected in the blog-network.
Perhaps, then, the predictions that the middle-blogs are the future of blogging are off. With increasingly insular and closed networks (as type 1 networks are) the myth of a unified "blogosphere" becomes even further from the truth. We need to start focusing on the long-tailers as the meat of blog-networks. How can they operate in a socially beneficial manner? Are bloggers doomed to always be preaching to their choir as their choir preaches right back?

Comments
Thanks for the link.
As much as I aspire to be Steve, I'm not quite there yet.
Some of the friendships I am talking about are non-blog ones, in the sense that they occur not only via blog posts and comments, but via email, IM, etc. as well. Certainly some of them would continue in the absence of blogs. Others are mostly via blog content. But hopefully many of them are deep enough to move to another medium if the blogs went away.
I will read this post and your last one and, hopefully comment again if I have anything to add.
Peace,
Kent
(friend of Steve, but not him)
Posted by: Kent Newsome | February 23, 2006 12:05 AM
Steve meet Kevin. Kevin meet Steve. ;)
The new way to tell an up and coming "A lister" --- people are in such a rush to reply to his/her post that they get the name wrong.
Posted by: Fraser | February 23, 2006 01:03 AM
sorry about that, writing in a rush has never served me well
Posted by: nathan | February 23, 2006 03:43 PM